Palabras clave
Participación
Evaluación
Gobernanza
Cómo citar
Resumen
Dentro del campo de la gobernanza adaptativa, la evaluación es un área que necesita mayor atención. La pesca artesanal en Uruguay fue el foco de esta investigación ya que está atravesando una transición de gobernanza. Consejos locales multiactorales han sido formados para buscar soluciones a problemas pesqueros en forma colectiva. En uno de estos consejos, facilitamos un proceso de evaluación participativa (EP) con involucramiento de diferentes actores implicados (pescadores e instituciones gubernamentales). El objetivo fue investigar el potencial de la EP para fortalecer los dos pilares principales del co-manejo adaptativo: la colaboración y el aprendizaje. Los resultados muestran que la cooperación y la comunicación entre los actores aumentaron; las relaciones pescadores-instituciones y las conexiones interinstitucionales mejoraron. Los talleres de evaluación se convirtieron en un espacio de aprendizaje; los actores mejoraron sus habilidades para participar e interactuar con otros. Como conclusión, la EP contribuye a la maduración del co-manejo adaptativo.
Citas
Armitage, D. R., et al. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. En: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 95-102.
Baird, J., Plummer, R. y Pickering, K. (2014). Priming the governance system for climate change adaptation: the application of a social-ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. En: Ecology and Society, 19(1), 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06152-190103
Berg, B.L. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston: Pearson.
Berkes, F., Colding, J. y Folke, C. (eds). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. En: Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 489–500.
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H. y Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356
Conley, A. y Moote, M. A. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 371–386.
Cundill, G. y Fabricius, C. (2010). Monitoring the governance dimension of natural resource comanagement. En: Ecology and Society, 15(1), 15. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art15/
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. y Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. En: Science, 302, 1907-1912.
Estrella, M., et al. (eds). (2000). Learning from change. Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation. IDRC, Ottawa, and Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
Ferreyra, C. y Beard, P. (2007). Participatory Evaluation of Collaborative and Integrated Water Management: Insights from the Field. En: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 271-296.
Folke, C., et al. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. En: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-73.
Folke, C. (2007). Social-ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons. En: Ecological Research, 22, 14-15.
Izurieta, A., et al. (2011). Developing indicators for monitoring and evaluating joint management effectiveness in protected areas in the Northern Territory, Australia. En: Ecology and Society, 16(3), 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04274-160309
Lemos, M. C. y Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. En: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325.
Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. En: Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/
Pahl-Wostl, C., et al. (2007). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. En: Ecology and Society, 12(2), 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art30/
Papineau, D. y Kiely, M. (1996). Participatory evaluation in a community organization: fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization. En: Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(1), 19-93.
Plummer, R., et al. (2012). Adaptive comanagement: a systematic review and analysis. En: Ecology and Society, 17(3), 11. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art11/
Sayer, J., et al. (2007). Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. En: Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(9), 2677-2694.
Trimble, M. y Berkes, F. (2015). Towards adaptive co-management of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay and Brazil: lessons from using Ostrom’s design principles. En: Maritime Studies, 14, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40152-015-0032-y
Trimble, M. y Plummer, R. (2018). Participatory evaluation in times of governance transition: the case of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay. Ocean & Coastal Management, 161, 74–83.
Trimble, M. y Plummer, R. (2019). Participatory evaluation for adaptive co-management of social–ecological systems: a transdisciplinary research approach. Sustainability Science, 14(4), 1091–1103.
Walker, G. B. y Daniels, S.E. (2001). Natural resource policy and the paradox of public involvement: Bringing scientists and citizens together. En: Understanding Community-based Ecosystem Management (Gray, G. J., Enzer, M. J. and Kusel, J., eds). The Haworth Press, Inc., New York., 253-269.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 2nd Ed. Applied Social Science Research Methods Series Vol 5. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
